
WAX
LiveAtomicAssets. One read returns a holder's whole inventory, so a grove can narrow to a single schema or weight a legendary template as five commons.
That is a strange trade. You bought an NFT because you wanted to own it, and staking it means giving it to a contract, paying to get in, paying to get out, and not having it for a while. The Orchard asks for none of that, because it never needed the NFT in the first place — only the answer to who owns it, which the chain already publishes. What it asks for instead is a commitment, and it makes breaking one cost you rather than making it impossible.
Ownership is read straight from the chain. The NFT sits where it always sat. Nothing about it changes when you plant, and nothing changes when you stop.
There is no transaction to sign, so there is nothing to pay for. On WAX a normal staking contract costs you RAM and CPU both ways. This costs zero, both ways.
Planting is a promise, not a visit. Sell before the pour ends and you forfeit what you have not harvested — to the other holders, never to us. Harvested is yours for good, so take it early and often.
A token balance that goes wrong can be made good. A one-of-one that goes wrong is gone. We hold reward tokens in escrow. We never hold anybody's NFTs.
This is a real sequence, so it is worth numbering. Everything after step three happens on its own.
WAX takes one memo transfer; Base takes a signature. Both are free, both move nothing, both are the same wallet linking that already decides your server roles — and you never do it again.
$wallet add yourwax.wam
$wallet add 0xyour…
MENTA reads your wallet, counts what matches that grove's collection, and tells you on the spot. Nothing leaves your wallet, then or ever.
$plant chadpunks
That is the whole job, and it is the deal. Every few minutes MENTA re-reads the chain and pays out for the stretch just gone. Sell before the pour ends and you forfeit whatever is still unharvested; once it ends you can leave with everything.
It lands in your MENTA balance, ready to tip, swap, put in a pot or withdraw. There is no deadline and nothing expires.
$harvest
Ownership is sampled on a timer rather than watched continuously, and that is exactly the gap a flash buy would aim at: buy a hundred NFTs a minute before the snapshot, sell them a minute after, collect as though you had held all week.
So a period pays out at the smaller of the count at its start and the count at its end. Held it the whole way through, you are paid the whole way through. Not there at the start, that period pays you nothing.
It also means a brand-new planter earns from their second sweep rather than their first, which is the same rule seen from the other side, and is worth saying out loud rather than leaving to be discovered.
Planting commits you until the pour runs dry. Nothing physically stops you selling — MENTA never has your NFT to hold on to — so the commitment is enforced the only honest way left: break it and you forfeit whatever you have not harvested. It goes to the holders who stayed, never to us.
The date is fixed the moment you plant and is never extended behind your back. A pour the creator starts next week does not lengthen a commitment you accepted today — otherwise a grove could hold a room forever by topping up, which is a trap rather than a term. Plant again and you take on the new date knowingly.
A creator who would rather ask for nothing can open a grove with no lock at all.
Read from the live ledger. Numbers are totals only — a wallet's contents are public on chain, but which Discord account holds it is not.
Your collection is on WAX or Base; the reward does not have to be on either. A pour can be any token MENTA supports across eight chains, so a WAX collection can pay in a Base token and nobody bridges anything. Opening a grove needs Manage Server, and takes a single line.
$grove check chadpunkswax
Look up a collection before you commit. On WAX: who runs it and its schemas. On Base: which standard it implements, and therefore whether you can weight rarity.$grove new chadpunks chadpunkswax
Open a grove on WAX. Add a schema name to narrow it to part of a collection.$grove new apes 0xabc…
Open one on Base. Paste the contract address — MENTA asks the contract whether it is an ERC-721 or an ERC-1155 and sets the grove up accordingly.$grove pour chadpunks 5m CHAD 30d
The reward. It leaves your balance now and drips to holders across those days.$grove weight chadpunks 123456=5
Rarity, optional. That template — or ERC-1155 token id — counts as five ordinary ones. Not available on a plain ERC-721.$grove close chadpunks
Stop new planting. Pours already running keep paying the holders who are in.The tokens leave your balance into escrow when the pour starts, and no code path returns them. That is the point: somebody deciding whether to hold for a month has to be able to rely on the number they were shown.
While nobody is planted the drip cannot advance, so the end date slides out by the idle time. Launch the pour before you announce it and you lose nothing.
Ownership comes from the AtomicAssets contract on WAX, and from the NFT contract itself on Base — never from an indexer's cached answer. If every NFT API went down this afternoon, the right holders would still be paid the right amounts.
Three chains live, and a grove reads ownership straight from whichever one its collection is on — while the reward can be any token MENTA knows, on any of the seven. Your collection on Solana can pay in a WAX token. Nobody bridges anything.

AtomicAssets. One read returns a holder's whole inventory, so a grove can narrow to a single schema or weight a legendary template as five commons.
ERC-721 and ERC-1155. The fastest chain we read — one call, no paging, 59ms a wallet against WAX's ~300ms. Editions carry their own weight, one per token id.

Metaplex collections, read straight off the chain. Only membership the collection authority has verified ever counts — an unverified claim is just text a minter typed.
Polygon, Arbitrum, Optimism and Avalanche already carry MENTA balances, and their NFTs read exactly the way Base's do. Three chains in, the pattern holds: a new one is a reader, not a rebuild — every grove's maths already runs the same on all of them.
Two things stay true on every chain: nothing is ever transferred, and the chain itself decides who gets paid — never an indexer's cached answer. What differs is only how much detail a chain will hand back, and each card above says exactly what its own does.
The Orchard pays holders. Two newer things read the same collections and pay nobody at all — they are about status, which is the other reason people collect.
$cloutA score read straight off the chain: what somebody holds, what they have listed, what they have bought and sold. Listing is worth more than holding, and holding without listing costs points — a collection that moves is worth more than a drawer. It also counts what people do: playing the games, tipping, filling the room’s jar. That half needs no wallet at all, so everybody in a server has standing, not just collectors. Points buy nothing. They are not a balance and nothing pays out against them.
$setsEvery set in a collection, how far through it somebody is, and the exact pieces they are missing — each one linking to the market. A set can be a schema or any field the artist minted, so sets can span several schemas. See a collection laid out →